education too expensive? _____________________Essayez ignorance! ... (Lincoln)
__Tout is as if you wanted the slow death of National Education.
It is no longer a priority in practice.
There is a drift, a sort of demolition behind the words that say otherwise. A weakening in any case, desired by the dominant economic elites, for whom the Republican values of "public education" no longer of interest. It rejects the ideal of Condorcet and J. Ferry as old moons. As if knowledge and self-judgment disturbed, had hampered the production and consumption in circles ... A process that dates back to the 80s.
"Private foundations are emerging. At the University of Clermont-Ferrand, president, Philippe Dulbecco, has brought managers from companies such as Michelin or Limagrain the board. "It avoids spending half an hour on the price of coffee" , he laughs. In January, the college has partnered with Chinese Tellhow to create a campus in Nanchang. "Our goal is 10,000 students eventually. This is our life. "
In Bordeaux, the foundation is chaired by Jean-Rene Fourtou, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Vivendi, which injected 250 000 euros in personnel. SFR and Sanofi-Synthelabo have also invested 500 000 euros. Stéphane Roussel, HRD of Vivendi, has to carry his idea through this molt: "should the Minister of Higher Education and Employment that are the same. " (KM)
__ The deterioration of education, the disintegration of the institution, the lack of pretext of greater efficiency and" modernization ", the lack training new teachers, gusts ad also unrealistic ephemeral, give the impression that one wants to divert attention from real operating conditions and the underlying projects .
is dependent upon premiums, rectors and principals, to better manage the shortage and even recruit replacement staff .
" Everything works like a tiny privileged minority had deliberately organized a deliquescent which would benefit only their heirs - children of cadres of teachers and children, offspring of demagogues and educators who are careful to include their offspring to " school Public "they recommend to others, and supporters of education vouchers, for which each aberration of the system is a step closer to the Apocalypse that will justify their ambitions - and their appetites ... " ( Brighelli )
Some teachers quit in the face of crumbling school
The inspectors express their discomfort
schedules French , foundations of all learning, have been drastically reduced
"The school does not become earlier and more strong " , notes Christian Clinet, headmaster Edgar Poe, Paris
_ We are witnessing a shift to various forms of privatization . A mutation low noise
A methodical destruction : "since 2007 ... The application of an automatic deletion of positions requires the dogma of non-replacement a staff of two as required by the RGPP (General Review of Public Policies). It led the destruction of support systems that had proven themselves as the Rased in replacements increasingly dangerous in many classrooms, increasing the number of pupils per class in primary school as in college and the reduction in enrollment from two years. This does not prevent the Minister L. Chatel consider unsmiling in his statement of 23 January 2011, experimenting with the teaching of English from three years ... Recall that 11 200 posts were abolished in 2008, 13,500 in 2009, 16,000 in 2010 and 16,000 deletions are expected again the 2011 budget. The discovery of new "sources of employment" would be saying this "rationalization" smoothly.
order to overcome concerns about the reduction of resources, with constant agitation suggests that we will take better care of pupils and a better organization of working time will adapt to the needs of children . The move to four-day week by X. Darcos has been a good example. The recent parliamentary report issued December 9, 2010 by Mr. MP UMP Tabarot unfortunately all pointed to the fragility of the new system and called a return to a four-day week and a half. It appears as 6 hours per day and 144 days of class, students have the French daily schedules the heaviest in Europe.
The most emblematic is that of mastering the training of teachers. As the ministry said on its website: "The mastering will rise in the level of recruitment and improving the quality of training. This reform will establish the recruitment of teachers in schools, colleges and high schools at Masters 2 (bac +5). Nobody could take place against an improvement the quality of teacher training. Behind this argument nevertheless appear all the difficulties of implementation. Forget the fact that the reform launched by the statement of N. June 2, 2008 Sarkozy was initiated without any prior consultation. Forget the obsession with mid
istry who was first to remove the teacher training institutes and reduce the financial burden related to the payment of probationers .. " The brainwashing is going well ...
We raided the public school
" The money was swallowed up in the cracks of public schools. There are of course private education, which refuses every year more than 30,000 applications because they can open additional classes. But as tutoring, coaches, private prépas at Sciences-Po, medicine, pharmacy and now for the contest as a police officer, teacher or school of physiotherapy.
is the reverse of the medal. In the space of thirty years, the proportion of graduates has increased by three in France to 65% of an age. But higher education has not adapted. One third of the BTS, very short training requested is provided by private schools. Even in the secondary disaster.
Officially, equality of opportunity prevails. In fact, the school system has never been so unfair. The post-68 generation discovers that there has never been as few children of workers and employees in large schools. HEC, ENA, Polytechnique are machines to clone elite. And inequality continues to grow. In 2008, 78% of students from upper classes have a Bachelor L, O or S, cons only 18% of pupils of social disadvantage. This year, 130,000 young people leave school without a diploma or training. A national disaster. "
... A particular case and a modality of what is euphemistically called " political feasibility of adjustment "
" This policy is simply that of reducing costs and deficits, and the fullest liberalization of any sector capable of commodification. These measures are generally unpopular. The problem is to implement them without too much damage. By damage, it is meant primarily the "hay" what do people who are its victims. The article examines the ways sweet to pass these measures (that's feasible), and to this end he distinguishes between "stabilization" and "adjustment" : "Indeed, the program stabilization has an urgent and necessarily involves a lot of unpopular measures since it reduced sharply the income and consumption of households by reducing the salaries of civil servants, subsidies or employment in the building. However, structural adjustment measures can be spread over many years and each measurement made at the same time both winners and losers, so the government can easily build a coalition to defend its policy beneficiaries. " (Sic) The adjustment referred to has nothing to do with that which one might think at first glance. And it's even worse than expected: "The adjustment is not content to add stimulus to economic compensation or giving a positive aspect to a brutal policy of cost reduction and may present, ably handled, two virtues of political importance: to be painless and can divide his victims by hitting them unequally. All art is to know how to use . "
_ This destruction of the Public Education Department through its decline in quality is programmed since 1996 in the OECD report entitled" The political feasibility of adjustment .
Will they go through to its logical ?
_ _ The French school Is changing the model?
- France has the school-teacher ratios the lowest in the OECD
___ employability should not be the only goal of Education ____________________
_ What goals to the general revision of public policy? _ _______________
(Drawing: Pancho)
0 comments:
Post a Comment