Hasbara or Za'bara
To maintain facade of moral code, you do not kill a friend, you kill an enemy. You will not shirk not the house of another man, you get your property long forgotten. These are the principles adopted in all wars and all conflicts. Therefore the mission of the aggressor has always been to describe the target to kill, that is to say the enemy as a person or a group bad, bad, deserves to be defeated, and s' he is killed, it will be a natural end to his bad behavior. Similarly, the mission of the occupier was to pretend he is not stealing someone else but just trying to recover his property, which he had neglected to do for centuries.
Nobody much perfected the art of deception, or double talk, the Zionist agents. How else to explain the success of a Hungarian like Herzl, sitting in a cafe in Vienna, and professing a Jewish State be established in 50 years in a faraway country, where he had never lived? Its success, almost exclusively in Europe at the time, manifested by the fact that he managed to convince the colonial powers of the benefits that could support its colonial project and to convince their peoples, Europeans, that conquest - through murder, looting and setting of a people in poverty - was the result of divine will, a miracle and a victory for Western civilization.
No one had to create create as many myths and lies in his efforts that the Zionists. The reason is simple: they had no credible evidence to support their cause, they had to invent alternatives doubtful, based on willingness to believe the people gullible and opportunistic politicians.
Take the slogan: "Palestine is a land without people". It was a terra nullius , they say. Of course, the Zionists knew that people lived there and had built more than 1000 cities and towns, most dating back 2000 years, according to Eusebius Bishop of Caesarea (313 AD.) who has registered. Yet the Zionists have provided a map to Conférrence of Versailles in 1919, showing Palestine as "a land of nomads for grazing. They presented the card to the colonial powers, particularly the British and the French. The irony, of course, is that the British had concluded their investigation voluminous on Palestine, 40 years earlier, in 10 volumes, listing 12 000 historic sites, including cities and villages, and the French had concluded their investigation conducted by the scientist Victor Guerin in 1863, which produced 8 volumes about his trip in almost all Palestinian villages. Yet they chose to believe the Zionists and to deceive their audience to support this "noble morality" conquest, churches, newspapers and public debate.
What is the meaning of terra nullius ? This does not mean (to them) an empty land. This means that those who live there do not matter, they are worthless. It's like cleaning the wood dry brush and insects.
Here the exact words of Herzl
"If we entering a region where there are wild animals which the Jews are not accustomed to - large snakes etc. - I will use the natives, before giving them a job in the transit countries [read: expulsion] for the extermination of these animals. "
course, he did not write this in his book published, but only in his then unpublished diary.
Balfour said:
" ... In Palestine, we do not propose even to go through the formality of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country. Zionism [has] a greater impact than the desires and prejudices [not the rights] of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land . "How
this colonial project in Palestine was it packed in diplomatic language? In the Balfour Declaration, called it a" national home "for Jews - not a state to the exclusion of the locals - in Palestine, not Palestine of . What about these people? Of course, there is a reference to them: "Without prejudice to the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine", 92% of the population. That's an idea afterwards really civilized.
If your home and your family are threatened by an unwelcome flood of immigrants (European Jews), and you get up to fight, you are called a "bandit". Your house is destroyed, your reserves are burned, your son and your father were killed or imprisoned. This is what the British did in 1939.
Ten years later, when the Zionists were depopulated Palestinian villages and 675 towns and over 70 massacres committed during the ethnic cleansing of the Nakba, some people naturally tempted to return home, at least to rescue an old father, watering the garden or to feed the animals left behind. Nobody believed that the exile would last more than a few weeks. These returnees have been killed by the Israelis on the spot. Complaints have been filed Mixed Armistice Committee saying that the victims were "infiltrated" by the same people who had "infiltrated" in Palestine a few years earlier.
Thus, the conventional wisdom is that those who addressed scores of Palestine on a boat smugglers in the dark of the night are not "undercover", they are the masters of the earth, and the actual owners of the house were evicted from their homes and tried to return home are "infiltrators".
1500 Twenty days later, the trick is always applied. At the time of this writing, Israel has issued Military Order No. 1650 (Second Amendment) under which seventy thousand Palestinians in the West Bank and from other parts of Palestine are likely to be deported as "infiltrators". By analogy, an Italian from Naples to found Rome under Nazi occupation during the Second World War would have been likely to be deported to Albania as "infiltrated". It must be admitted that the crime of ethnic cleansing, regularly trained by the Israeli propaganda machine "transfer of population" has reached new heights of sophistication. It is now called "Prevention of Infiltration.
The Hasbara - هاسباراه - הסברה - is that the Za'bara- زعبرة
It often tells the story of Ain Haoud, a small village south of Haifa, the beautiful stone houses. Its population was deported, but she managed to stay in Israel. They built huts on the opposite hill, watching their homes every day, now occupied by artists from Romania that have transformed the village into "artists colony". Their lands and homes were confiscated under the 1950 Law on Property of Absentees. The "Absent" are refugees expelled.
The logic is that the state of Israel takes ownership of those "missing" because they "abandoned" their property, presumably to make a golden exile on the Riviera, and not in a refugee camp. It is the duty of a State "democratic" to take care of their property (use, lease) for the exclusive use of Jews. This logic excludes the fact that they are absent because they were expelled. If they returned, they would be slaughtered as "infiltrators."
The irony never ends. If one way or the other inhabitants of the village remained in the area seized by Israel, they must be identified and receive identity cards. Therefore, they are "present". But their property must be confiscated because they are "absent". Therefore, they received the appellation of "absent-present" a true oxymoron.
It never stops surprising. One of these "absent-present 'Ain Haoud was exhausted. Then one day he went to the opposite hill and knocked on the door of his house. A Romanian artist he opened it. The owner asked him who he was:
- I am Ephraim
- UU are you, Ephraim?
- From here, of course, Ain Haoud. Why are you asking this question? And you are who you?
- I am Abu Ahmed, Romania.
massive ethnic cleansing of Palestine, which took place in 1948/49, the year of the Nakba (Catastrophe), unprecedented in modern history, must have in the Zionist lexicon an appropriate name who hides his ugliness. They called it "War of Independence," which is precisely in what the Palestinians have been engaged since the Balfour Declaration of 1917, that is to say from the betrayal of the Allies and their collusion with the Zionists for deprive them of their homeland. The term Zionist was adopted by Jewish immigrants who have infiltrated Palestine, ethnic cleansing to describe the original inhabitants of Palestine. It was widely accepted by the West. Fortunately, now ; cracks began to appear in this edifice of deception. Now he is against the law in Israel to talk of Nakba. The monopoly is only deception.
The green line is the term often used to describe the line that separates Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) in the West Bank and Gaza. What is this line? Why is it green? His real name is "Armistice Line of 1949". This is the line where Israeli forces have stopped the invasion in 1949, having conquered 78% of Palestine. It was a big leap from 5.5% of land owned by Jews under the Mandate (UK) and more than 24% over the distribution given by the partition plan (UN). Israel signed Four armistice agreements with Arab countries. Section 2 of these agreements inidque clear that this line does not confer or deny any entitlement to a party and has no legal value. No military force is allowed to cross, where the armistice. It is simply a dividing line between Palestine that was occupied in 1948 that occupied in 1967. Israel has taken in 1967, in violation of international law. To conceal the legal meaning of the line and its crossing, it was dubbed by Israel the Green Line, the pen color used by the Israelis on their cards. This simple device consisting to rename the line allows Israel to engage in its media machine that he has violated no law and has gained no territory. Thus, Netanyahu may announce coldly in interviews with CNN that the Jews should be able to live anywhere (in Palestine) without fear of contradiction. Now, Israel has flatly removed this line of his cards.
How to Steal a whole cake and eat it? First you must steal half a cake. In the absence of deterrence, you steal the other half. You eat the whole cake under the "principle" that the two halves must be "unified" (In your stomach).
Israel occupied West Jerusalem in 1948 and East Jerusalem in 1967. Israel said the city should remain "united" under his control. The mantra of "unification" is intended to conceal the fact that the two acts are not only illegal under international law, but, surprisingly, they are contrary to the founding laws of Israel.
The declaration of "independence" of Israel stated that its international legitimacy if it is low, based on the recommendations of the Partition Plan. But this plan was never put Jerusalem, Israel. Israel occupied West Jerusalem, Lydda, Ramle and Galilee and southern parts in violation of the Partition Plan. The admisssion of Israel in the UN was conditional on its adherence to the Partition Plan and the resolution on the return of refugees. It there is never consistent. Needless to say that the occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, is a clear violation of "the inadmissibility of military conquest." However, "the unification of Jerusalem" is trumpeted by Israel and AIPAC as the justification for building anywhere (for Jews only) "in the eternal capital of Israel, which is not a colony."
Similarly, the occupation of the West Bank is labeled "liberation of Judea and Samaria." The Apartheid Wall, condemned by the International Court of Justice, is called "security fence". The redeployment of the occupation forces is described as "withdrawal".
Nothing is more deceptive than the withdrawal of the Gaza Strip. Israel controls the territory, his heaven, its subsoil and its surroundings. The famine was organized in Gaza by Israeli officials described as "putting the plan population, "a new kind of slow death designed not to make headlines around the world.
The real name of this tragedy is" war crimes "and" genocide "as defined in Articles 6 and 8 the 1998 Rome Statute creating the International Criminal Court. These two articles describe exactly the situation in Gaza.
Palestinians in Gaza were promised water, food, medical care and a levee (partial? ) the blockade if they bent the conditions of the Quartet: recognizing Israel's occupation and stop the resistance against them. Blair did not spare a microphone To bleat that $ 4.5 billion are waiting to rebuild destroyed Gaza, with the sole condition that the Palestinians accept the Quartet conditions.
Blair is a liar patented. The media have believed or pretended. No charge, no journalists, no "expert" advised him say he is lying. One man. Alvaro de Soto, the UN mediator in its end of mission report in May 2007, stated in paragraph 79, the Quartet has never imposed any conditions. These conditions are Americans and the European Union according to their own policy, using the UN and Russia as a shield for their requirements.
A familiar name on the TV screens is Sderot, the Israeli settlement, the victim of projectiles launched from tubes that have smashed a kitchen window and killed one person in 8 years. The mayor of Sderot, perpetual expresses his fear of the incredibly crowded Gaza, the cradle of terrorism, and is visited by dignitaries from European capitals and Congress Americans.
None of these officials do not know or unwilling to declare that Sderot is a settlement built on village lands of Najd, which expelled the population lives just two miles away, in a refugee camp. They launch projectiles their home on their own land, their occupants, in a symbolic gesture to assert their right to their homes in the occupied territory.
dignitaries lament over the crowded conditions in the Gaza Strip, misery, poverty and despair. They shake their head sadly. The bravest go to Gaza in flying visit of two hours, without contact with real people, huddled behind officials from the relief agency of the UN, to prevent them from being eaten by hungry people.
One of these distinguished visitors he never asked why the Gaza Strip is crowded and miserable? It is crowded because that is where the population of 247 Palestinian villages ethnically cleansed in 1948, was crammed into an open prison on an area of 1% of Palestine. They are packed at a density of 6,000 persons per square kilometer while the mayor of Sderot & Co.. stroll on land with a density of 6 persons per square kilometer.
Let them return to their land and you will not overcrowded, not poverty, not "terrorism". If the idea does not please you, give them what the Israelis: F16 and Merkava tanks. "Terrorism" stop and a nice little war will begin.
gives Israel the license to destroy any village and kill its inhabitants under "preventive operations", sometimes called "retaliation." According to this principle, you may think your neighbor looks wicked and it may one day decide to kill you. So you decide to take action to catch him by surprise and kill him. You do not need to see tanks moving. You do not need any proof. Your mindset is enough, especially if you're a racist. This is the explanation given by Israel for the killings in the camp Bureij in Qibya, Samou and a dozen other places. This policy came into the language of international diplomacy as a respectable word. It can spread to see newspaper headlines, even if it is in flagrant violation of the spirit and letter of the UN Charter.
From the examples above, it is clear that manipulation of the media and loaded terminology are the secret army of Zionists. This kind of army can not be pinned by Goldstone, Dugard or Falk. But it commits crimes like the other army. The Hasbara
No need for more developer. But for those who are eager to know the facts, and they are fortunately more and more for these brave people worldwide who are guided by their moral sense and the Palestinians, of course, carry the burden of truth unspeakable, all these, the Israeli Hasbara is best described by an Arabic word homophone: Za'bara, which means: words sound meaningless and convoluted.
The world will be a better place, and justice will have a chance to win when the Hasbara be recognized for what it really is: a pure Za'bara. When the truth shines, it clears the clouds of myth.
To read other articles of the First Word War, click here
